
Just read this article at Practical Fishkeeping Fish evolve quicker then you think. It made me think about what is a good definition of evolution? and how does it differ from adaptation? does it matter? For many Darwinist and creationist they terms matters a lot and they go to great lengths to specify exactly what they support (or don't). I can imagine that individuals on both side would argue at great length about this particular bit of research. Claiming it is either proof or a mini distraction.


If we encouraged adaptation could we preserve the wild populations and make space for them in other areas. Then if we ever manage to re-establish their original habitat. What I am imagining is if we encouraged and supported the growth of coral reefs in new locations that would support existing tropical corals in waters that with rising temperature will closely match they current home. Can we help coral species make the leap into new territory. For polar bears with the melting ice caps will some migrate south and start establishing other food sources? will they then come into competition with other predators. Can we help to try and create safe havens?
The fate of many species will not be decided by one specific action by human either for or against them. The fate of many animals will be decided by their species ability to adapt. This fish research gives me hope and I wonder how we can help?
Comments